A new systematic review and meta-analysis published in Scientific Reports challenges the popular belief that abstaining from social media improves well-being. Analyzing 10 studies with data from 4,674 participants, researchers found no statistically significant impact of social media abstinence on happiness or life satisfaction.
This contradicts widespread claims that “social media detoxes” lead to improved mental health, suggesting that quitting platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), or Instagram may not necessarily make people feel better.
Key Study Findings
- No Impact on Well-Being: Participants who quit social media for up to 28 days showed no meaningful changes in happiness or life satisfaction.
- Short-Term Abstinence May Be Insufficient: Since most studies focused on abstinence periods under a month, the long-term effects remain unclear.
- No Differences by Age or Gender: The study found no variation in the impact of social media abstinence based on sex or age group.
- Limited Research & Definitions: Some studies did not clearly define whether instant messaging apps (e.g., WhatsApp) were included in “social media.” Additionally, the types of devices used for social media access were often unspecified.
The Social Media Paradox
Social media has both benefits and drawbacks:
- Enhances connectivity & information sharing
- Supports mental health through online communities
- Provides entertainment & educational content
- Can contribute to stress & FOMO (fear of missing out)
- May lead to reduced productivity
- Can create negative social comparisons
This dual nature has led to increasing calls for digital detoxes, with claims that quitting social media restores mental well-being. However, this study suggests that the mental health benefits of abstinence may be overstated.
Implications for Mental Health & Future Research
Should You Quit Social Media?
- Short breaks alone may not be enough to improve happiness.
- Instead of complete abstinence, mindful social media use may be a more effective approach.
What Needs Further Study?
- Long-term abstinence (months/years) vs. short-term breaks.
- Different usage patterns (e.g., passive scrolling vs. active engagement).
- Impacts of platform-specific abstinence (e.g., quitting TikTok vs. LinkedIn).
Alternative Strategies for Well-Being
Rather than a full detox, experts suggest:
- Setting time limits on social media use
- Engaging in offline activities for balance
- Curating a positive social media environment
Conclusions
This study debunks the myth that quitting social media automatically improves well-being. While excessive use can have negative effects, merely abstaining from social platforms may not be the solution. Instead, a more balanced and intentional approach to digital interactions might be key to maximizing benefits while minimizing harm.
More Information: Lemahieu, L., Vander Zwalmen, Y., Mennes, M. et al. (2025) The effects of social media abstinence on affective well-being and life satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep15, 7581. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-90984-3.
more recommended stories
How Soybean Oil Impacts Weight Gain and MetabolismWhy Soybean Oil May Affect Metabolism.
New Malaria Prevention Insights From African BiostatisticsHow New Data Is Reframing Malaria.
Coffee and Cognitive Function: Evidence ReviewA new narrative review in Cureus.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Low in Adults 45–49Recent UCLA research reveals that colorectal.
Gut Immune Cells and Long-Lasting Antiviral Protection.Breakthrough Findings on How Gut Immune.
Mild Pancreatic Duct Dilatation Signals Higher Cancer RiskEarly Structural Changes Offer Critical Clues.
How the Uterus Senses Force During Labor: New InsightsA new study published in Science.
Fat-Free Mass and Brain Outcomes in Preterm BabiesEarly Fat-Free Mass May Hold the.
How Hormones Shape Dopamine-Driven LearningNYU Study on Hormones and Cognitive.
Protein Pair Guides Chromosome Alignment in MitosisKey Points A joint research team.

Leave a Comment