

Because of the opioid crisis, doctors are less likely to give painkillers to patients to help them control their pain, even in the operating room.
A recent study published in JAMA Surgery by researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) suggests that restricting the use of opioids during surgery may be doing more damage than good.
Researchers evaluated data on 61,249 patients who had surgery at MGH between 2016 and 2020 for the study. Patients who received more fentanyl and hydromorphone during surgery were less likely to suffer pain and required fewer opioids after waking up from anesthesia.
Furthermore, patients exposed to higher doses of fentanyl were less likely to experience uncontrolled pain or new chronic pain diagnosed within 3 months of surgery; they were less likely to be prescribed opioids at 30, 90, and 180 days after surgery; and they were less likely to develop new persistent opioid use, all with no increase in adverse effects.
“Our analysis adjusts for many factors that might influence the decision to give opioids intraoperatively, and accounts for the known properties of the drugs. Because of this we feel confident that the opioid exposure during surgery is driving this result,” says co-first author Ran Liu, Ph.D., a research fellow in the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine at MGH.
The findings emphasize the need of ensuring that patients do not awaken from general anesthesia in pain, not just for their immediate well-being but also to prevent persistent pain and the necessity for long-term opiate use.
“The opioid crisis is a major motivator for mitigating the risks of opioid usage,” says co-first author Laura A. Santa Cruz Mercado, MD, anesthesiology resident in the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and former research fellow in the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine at MGH. “But appropriate opioid administration in the operating room may reduce total opioid usage after surgery.”
Patrick L. Purdon, Ph.D., the Nathaniel M. Sims Endowed Chair in Anesthesia Innovation and Bioengineering at MGH and an associate professor of Anesthesia at Harvard Medical School, a co-senior author, stresses that more study is needed to provide more explicit direction to surgical teams.
“We need to develop new technologies to help anesthesiologists titrate and optimize opioid administration in the operating room in a personalized way,” he says. “But this data gives us evidence that such efforts could have significant long-term benefits.
more recommended stories
Preeclampsia and Stroke Risk: Long-Term Effects
Preeclampsia (PE) – a hypertensive disorder.
Statins and Depression: No Added Benefit
What Are Statins Used For? Statins.
Azithromycin Resistance Rises After Mass Treatment
Mass drug administration (MDA) of azithromycin.
Generative AI in Health Campaigns: A Game-Changer
Mass media campaigns have long been.
Molecular Stress in Aging Neurons Explained
As the population ages, scientists are.
Higher BMI and Hypothyroidism Risk Study
A major longitudinal study from Canada.
Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Reduces Biological Age
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), especially when.
Childhood Cancer Diagnosis Delays Persist
Delays in childhood cancer diagnosis remain.
Hypothalamic Changes in Eating Disorders Explained
Groundbreaking MRI scans reveal microstructural hypothalamic.
Rapid Blood Test for Rare Diseases Revolutionizes Pediatric Diagnosis
A groundbreaking blood test developed by.
Leave a Comment