A New Preventive Strategy for Term Pre-eclampsia
A major UK randomised trial has introduced promising evidence that 36-week pre-eclampsia screening, combined with risk-stratified planned early-term birth, may offer a safe way to lower term pre-eclampsia rates. Published in The Lancet, the PREVENT-PE trial addresses a long-standing challenge in obstetric care: the lack of effective strategies to prevent pre-eclampsia that develops at term, where most cases occur.
By integrating maternal history, mean arterial pressure, and key biomarkers, this 36-week assessment helps clinicians identify women who are most likely to benefit from early-term delivery. The approach is both practical and acceptable in routine maternity care, showing no increase in emergency Caesarean sections, postpartum pre-eclampsia, or neonatal complications.
Explore All Obstetrics and Gynecology CME/CE Conferences and Online Courses
These findings highlight a feasible and patient-centred method that may reshape how high-risk pregnancies are managed in the final weeks of gestation.
Why Pre-eclampsia Screening Matters
Pre-eclampsia remains a leading hypertensive complication, affecting about 3% of pregnancies and contributing significantly to maternal and perinatal morbidity. Nearly 75% of cases occur at term, where preventive therapies are limited.
The study evaluated whether screening at 36 weeks using the FMF competing-risks model—incorporating maternal history, MAP, and biomarkers (PlGF and sFlt-1), could reliably identify women at elevated risk. Those with a predicted risk ≥1:50 in the intervention arm received personalised timing of birth between 37–40 weeks, depending on their risk level.
Evidence from the PREVENT-PE Trial
The trial included 8,094 singleton pregnancies, with participants randomly assigned before risk assessment. About 78% of the intervention arm were classified as low-risk and continued routine care, while high-risk women were offered planned early-term induction.
The results were clinically meaningful:
- 4% pre-eclampsia rate in the intervention group vs 5.6% in controls
- 30% relative reduction in term pre-eclampsia (ISSHP 2021 criteria)
- No increase in postpartum pre-eclampsia, NICU admissions, emergency Cesarean sections, or serious adverse events (<0.3%)
High participation rates (≈75%) also indicate strong acceptability among pregnant women, and planned economic evaluations may further support policy adoption.
Implications for Clinical Practice
This is the first randomized trial demonstrating that targeted, risk-based planned birth at early term, guided by 36-week pre-eclampsia screening, may reduce term disease safely. The findings could shape future guidelines supporting personalised third-trimester management for women at risk of hypertensive complications.
Source:
more recommended stories
Cardiovascular Risk and Sudden Cardiac Death in DiabetesRising Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) Risk.
Poor Kidney Function and Alzheimer’s Biomarkers ExplainedPoor kidney function may influence levels.
Walking Speed Before Hip Replacement Predicts RecoveryNew Evidence Points to a Simple,.
Neuroblastoma Drug Combo Extends Survival in ModelsA Promising Shift in High-Risk Neuroblastoma.
How Soybean Oil Impacts Weight Gain and MetabolismWhy Soybean Oil May Affect Metabolism.
Coffee and Cognitive Function: Evidence ReviewA new narrative review in Cureus.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Low in Adults 45–49Recent UCLA research reveals that colorectal.
Gut Immune Cells and Long-Lasting Antiviral Protection.Breakthrough Findings on How Gut Immune.
Mild Pancreatic Duct Dilatation Signals Higher Cancer RiskEarly Structural Changes Offer Critical Clues.
How the Uterus Senses Force During Labor: New InsightsA new study published in Science.

Leave a Comment